Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 41 - 60
of 16,211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court case Allen v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court case Allen v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court case Allen v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:18 am
The case is Prosec Guards CC v Department of Public Works and Infrastructure and Others (2501/23; 2502/23) [2024] ZAWCHC 139 (24 May 2024). [read post]
29 May 2024, 2:09 pm
Jennifer Odegard (Indian Child Welfare Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html In re JCR II/JCR/JCR/JCR, Minors (Indian Child Welfare Act) U.S. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:31 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Muldrow v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:00 am
Thomas says the following about Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:15 am
Huynh v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:46 am
For example, compare the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:42 am
The state court in that case explained that in 1970, in Williams v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:35 am
In the case of Birchfield v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Gender-affirming care Three of the cases involve constitutional challenges brought against state prohibitions on providing gender-affirming care to minors: United States v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
A. v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm
To take an example that echoes his recent attack on Judge Merchan, in 2019 he said that a group of four minority congresswomen should “go back” to the countries they came from rather than “loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States” how to run the government.Here again, Trump is playing to a receptive audience.In recent years Congress has passed many fewer laws than it did decades ago. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
“[I]nferring bad faith based on the racial effects of a political gerrymander in a jurisdiction in which race and partisan preference are very closely correlated” would, Alito suggested, allow litigants and courts to circumvent the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:12 am
Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
