Search for: "State v. Monaghan"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Montoya v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
First time round, they did a very good imitation of trade mark bullies when they took on a shop with the logo-line "The Monte Carlo Traditional Fish and Chips" in County Monaghan, Ireland (see T.M.R. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:24 am
S., at 204; United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 5:29 am
Judge Gould accomplishes the rare double-play, with last week's great decision in Yida (featured here) and this week's excellent opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Ironically, one of the cases that the defendants rely on is Petruska v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:00 am
Monaghan Mushrooms Ltd, 2011 ONSC 5820, where the lack of a registered assignment was a key fact in determining ownership of patents. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
Although she had correctly registered the employment picking mushrooms for Monaghan Mushrooms Ltd, she had not done so while working for either Smirnoff Vodka or Linwoods. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
On Oct. 5, the Fifth Circuit held in Texas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
Irish trade mark cases continue to fascinate the connoisseur, since there is nowhere quite like the Emerald Isle for those curious encounters where grit meets glamour (as where the men from Monte Carlo take on a fish and chip shop from County Monaghan, here) and where a couple of Marie Claires can get their claws out and have a real cat-fight, as happened here. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am
XX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 742 (15 June 2012). [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm
United States, 530 US 428 (2000). [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm
In other words, as Henry Paul Monaghan put it in an essay recently published by the Columbia Law Review, it is worth thinking about whether certiorari is “an area appropriate for the exercise of freestanding, unstructured, ‘all things considered,’ Bickelian-inspired prudential discretion? [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:05 am
Gutman also granted Plaintiff “the exclusive world-wide right and license to use her name ‘Hayley’, ‘Paige’, ‘Hayley Paige Gutman’, ‘Hayley Gutman’, ‘Hayley Paige’ or any derivative thereof ([defined] collectively [as] the ‘Designer’s Name’)” for certain purposes during the stated term of the Contract and for two years thereafter. . . . [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:16 pm
Anna / W&C: On build v buy. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
