Search for: "State v. New York State Public Employment Relations Bd."
Results 41 - 60
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 4:09 am
Determining the disciplinary penalty to be imposed following conviction of a crime underlying the disciplinary action taken against the employeeGarippa v New York City Bd. of Ed., NYS Supreme Court, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]A Section 3020-a arbitrator found Michael Garippa, a New York City school teacher, guilty of conduct unbecoming the profession and authorized his termination.Garippa, a tenured English… [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm
" The Appellate Division then ruled that "the presumption is that all terms and conditions of employment are subject to mandatory bargaining" [City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Further, public policy limitations on arbitrability are rare and "almost invariably" involve a nondelegable constitutional or statutory duty (Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. v New York State Pub. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In this action the Appellate Division was asked to review two determinations of the Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] that found that the State of New York [State] committed an improper employer practice.Civil Service Law §200 et seq., the so-called Taylor Law, requires a New York State public employer to bargain in good faith with its employees regarding all terms and… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
In this action the Appellate Division was asked to review two determinations of the Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] that found that the State of New York [State] committed an improper employer practice.Civil Service Law §200 et seq., the so-called Taylor Law, requires a New York State public employer to bargain in good faith with its employees regarding all terms and… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
A similar issue was addressed by the Appellate division in City of Rochester v Public Employment Relations Board, 15 AD3d 922, Leave to appeal denied, 4 N.Y.3d 710. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Reassignment of unit work to nonunit employees an improper practice under the Taylor LawMonroe County v New York State Pub. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:00 am
"**The Court of Appeals decision notes that "New York's public policy strongly disfavors the receipt of state pensions by persons also receiving state salaries, citing §150 of the Civil Service Law as establishing New York State's general public policy against the simultaneous receipt of a state pension and a state salary. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:44 am
” The decision suggests that it is consistent with public policy of New York State to refuse to employ a person convicted of drug dealing as a teacher. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Weingarten, Inc. (420 US 251 [1975]).A similar issue was addressed by the Appellate division in City of Rochester v Public Employment Relations Board, 15 AD3d 922, Leave to appeal denied, 4 N.Y.3d 710. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:33 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:33 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Relations Bd., 6 NY3d 563and Matter of Town of Wallkill v Civil Serv. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Click the button below to pay your registration fee with your credit card via PayPal: As the Appellate noted in Brady v New York County Dist. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
New York City Off. of Mgt. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm
[See, also, Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
For example, the cities of Aspen and Boulder and the city and County of Denver each had enacted ordinances which banned discrimination in many transactions and activities, including housing, employment, education, public accommodations, and health and welfare services. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The court also found that the information was exempt from disclosure under the cybersecurity exemption, noting that the Court of Appeals has explained that although FOIL is "'liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted'" to achieve its legislative purpose of maximizing public access to government records, "Courts must give an exemption its "natural and obvious meaning where such interpretation is consistent with the legislative intent and… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The court also found that the information was exempt from disclosure under the cybersecurity exemption, noting that the Court of Appeals has explained that although FOIL is "'liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted'" to achieve its legislative purpose of maximizing public access to government records, "Courts must give an exemption its "natural and obvious meaning where such interpretation is consistent with the legislative intent and… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
"An historical note: Prior to 1900 New York State civil service appointments from eligible lists were based on the rule of one, also referred to as "the rule of the list. [read post]
