Search for: "State v. Pancake" Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
March 24, 2016) the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has confirmed the significance of last year’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Cheeks v. [read post]
March 24, 2016) the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has confirmed the significance of last year’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Cheeks v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:47 pm by Brian W. Steinbach
March 24, 2016) the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has confirmed the significance of last year’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Cheeks v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
” In his dissent in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Some proposed settlement agreements may require court or agency approval Cheeks v Freeport Pancake House, Inc., USCA, 2ndCircuit, Docket 14-299 CVDorian Cheeks sued Freeport Pancake House [FPH] seeking to recover overtime wages, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees under both the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act [FLSA] and New York State’s Labor Law. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
This is due, Pinker states, because of two actions of the mind: chunking and functional fixity. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Some are desirable—Aunt Jemima should be allowed to control pancakes, not just pancake syrup to avoid confusion. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
 In this case "when in Rome" demanded that we devour a stack of pancakes. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Is pancake flour closer to syrup than sugar? [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm by Mark Litwak
 You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]