Search for: "State v. State Canvassing Board" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2021, 7:40 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Perhaps it’s stating the obvious, but it can’t hurt to have reminders of this. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Adam Baker
On the same day the Department met with the CEO, who, according to him, left with the understanding that if he met a certain price point then the Department would recommend renewal to the Treasury Board. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 6:28 pm by Gail Heriot
Just one among dozens of examples of its willingness to use "any means necessary" was its attempt to intimidate the Michigan Board of Canvassers into refusing to certify MCRI for the ballot. [read post]
  After canvassing the many faces of native advertising and the applicable law, the series ultimately examines the pervasive assumption that all native advertising is, and should be regulated as, “commercial speech. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm by Venkat
State Farm Mutual Other coverage: “Juror One” revisited: Court holds that SCA does not apply [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:58 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 In Protect Our Jobs v Board of State Canvassers, the Court of Appeals granted, in a divided, unpublished decision, a writ of mandamus directing that the proposal to be added to the ballot. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:01 am by Dianne Saxe
At least one US law firm is actively canvassing for fracking plaintiffs with a dedicated website. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Heller – Agreed 25-Mar United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm by Anita Krishnakumar
It seems to me that in canvassing the United States Code (and its own caselaw) for analogous statutory provisions (and its prior interpretations of those provisions), the Court is looking for a way to maintain consistency across the United States Code. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm by Jason M. Halper
’” The directors’ conduct could not “conceivably rise to [that] level,” according to the Court, where the board formed a disinterested and independent transaction committee, hired financial and legal advisors, held numerous meetings, widely canvassed the market of potential transaction partners, and considered financing strategies as alternatives to selling the company. [read post]