Search for: "State v. Thaler" Results 41 - 60 of 300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2013, 8:42 am by Kali Borkoski
Thaler, in an opinion by Justice Breyer (but announced by Justice Kennedy, because Justice Breyer was absent), the Court held by a vote of five to four  that when a state’s procedural framework, by reason of its  design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez… [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:54 am by Hillary Stemple
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] issued a ruling [opinion, PDF] on Tuesday in Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:36 am by Aurora Barnes
Thaler apply to ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claims that were technically raised in state habeas proceedings, but were unsubstantiated because of the ineffective assistance of state habeas counsel. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
  But the state didn't object to that until the case reached the SCOTUS certiorari stage.Smith v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:07 am by Jo Dale Carothers
The Federal Circuit recently addressed this issue in Thaler v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
  This point was made by the Court of Appeal at [94]-[96] of their recent judgment in Thaler v Comptroller [2021] EWCA Civ 1374 which IPKat friend friend, Brussels-based trainee patent attorney, Henry Yang, breaks down and cuts through the noise for our readers. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am by Kiran Bhat
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
The Supreme Court heard the landmark appeal, Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023], after it was initially dismissed in the High Court and Court of Appeal in 2021. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:35 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Supreme Court (links to these cases are available on the right-hand side of my blog) Thaler v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 8:27 pm by Mark Summerfield
You have also stated that it is sufficient for the purposes of the Patents Act 1990 if the applicant derives title to the invention from the inventor under section 15(1)(c). [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]