Search for: "State v. Woody"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2009, 5:35 pm
This was potentially part of the function of Colgrove v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
Google, Author's Guild v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:35 pm
Woody Woo, Inc., and stated that tips are the property of the employee whether or not the employer has taken a tip credit and that a valid tip pool may only include “those employees who customarily and regularly receive tips. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 12:13 pm
The federal district court, southern district of New York, has raised doubts about the facts asserted in the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
See Cumbie v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:08 am
In Cumbie v Woody Woo, Inc, a 2010 decision, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the FLSA does not prohibit an employer from instituting a tip pool that includes back-of-the-house workers if that employer pays its employees who share in tips the full minimum wage and does not take a tip credit. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
WHD will seek to enforce this position in the states making up the Ninth Circuit -- Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington -- notwithstanding that court’s decision in Cumbie v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:09 pm
Therefore, employers complying with state law minimum wages will not have to worry about the FLSA when constructing tip pools.The case is Cumbie v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cumbie v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cumbie v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cumbie v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:29 pm
” Casey v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:23 am
Woody Woo, Inc., 596 F.3d 577 (9th Cir. 2010). [read post]
21 May 2016, 7:19 am
Adam Klein provided a few thoughts on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
Woody Woo, Inc., 596 F.3d 577, 583 (9th Cir. 2010). [4] 76 Fed. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 6:16 am
Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle writes today about the Jan. 24th 7th Circuit decision in the Indiana case of Mayer v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:04 am
United States comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate and Danielle Blevins of Talk Radio News Service. [read post]
