Search for: "Stocking v. Ives"
Results 41 - 60
of 645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2009, 8:37 pm
QSBS Background Stock of a small business generally qualifies as QSBS if the stock meets certain requirements, including: (i) the small business is a domestic C corporation; (ii) the taxpayer acquired the stock at its original issue in exchange for money or other property (not including stock) or as compensation for services; (iii) the small business is engaged in a qualified trade or business and uses 80 percent (by value) of its assets in the active conduct of… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 12:26 pm
IV. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
Rap IP diss songs: Tupac Shakur’s Hit ‘Em Up v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
I don't really put much stock in that Canon anyway, since the trial of Bishop Righter. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:49 pm
On top of all that: employees who receive stock under a stock plan won't count towards the total. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:19 am
See Odyssey Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
The various stock markets have lost over half their value. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:06 pm
[The other articles in this seven-part series are here: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, Part VII.] [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
L v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:12 am
A few months ago, Dave blogged about SEC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:52 am
Part IV traces the place and pursuit of historical analysis in various legal systems and traditions across time, cultures, and space. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:36 am
In other words, Copaxone should remain a $4 billion drug, annually.link to Pantagraph: http://www.pantagraph.com/business/investment/markets-and-stocks/factors-that-sent-teva-pharmaceutical-industries-ltd-sliding-in/article_74234eee-a5ec-5c58-a54b-82597151b1e6.htmlPatents covering "three per week" dosing were not at issue in the Supreme Court case of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:30 am
In Red Oak Fund, L.P. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:52 am
Part IV traces the place and pursuit of historical analysis in various legal systems and traditions across time, cultures, and space. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 12:22 pm
The Complaint further alleges that as result of the foregoing, the Company stock traded at artificially inflated prices throughout the Class Period. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:48 pm
Here's a pop quiz for Corporations and Business Associations students based on the recent case of Gatz v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 12:54 pm
The arguable answers from a board of directors are i) don’t develop AI (too late, ii) don’t use it (largely too late and in any event uncontrollable), iii) make sure it is not corrupt at inception or corrupted in transition (good luck with that), (iv) rely on government regulation (whose government when and with what bias, v) ? [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 12:54 pm
Such was the result in Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
