Search for: "Stroock, Stroock " Results 41 - 60 of 203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2022, 3:01 pm by Joe Patrice
Someone Find The Wite-Out: Gibson Dunn, Paul Hastings, Jenner & Block, Allen & Overy, Stroock, and Akin all matched the Davis Polk scale. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:13 am by Dennis Crouch
  For the appeal and petition, he linked-up with Timothy Gilman’s team at Stroock. = = = Claim 1 of the ‘400 Patent: 1. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The damages incurred by loss of a potential buyout are completely speculative (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [2015] [dismissing legal malpractice claim where damages were based on multiple layers of speculation]; see also Zarin v Reid & Priest, 184 AD2d 385, 388 [1992] [rejecting a claim for damages which are “too speculative and incapable of being proven with any reasonable certainty”]). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:18 pm by Kathryn Rubino
Stroock Is Standing Up For Staff: Because they're people too. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 6:11 am by Jean O'Grady
Register for the Legal Industry Annual Report Webinar at this link, Topics will include: The effects of COVID-19 on the legal industry Lateral hiring at the partner and associate levels among the top 200 law firms in 2020 Law firm mergers and acquisition activity Law firm growth trends over the past year How law firms are doing in diversity efforts How technology has impacted lateral hiring Predictions for what 2021 may bring for the legal market Insights from some of the leading professionals in… [read post]
16 May 2020, 1:02 pm by Angela Mauroni
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP joined together to file a lawsuit on Thursday against US Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos over new regulations regarding the handling of sexual harassment and assault on college campuses. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:49 am by SHG
District Court in Maryland by the American Civil Liberties Union and the New York-based law firm Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:24 am by Dan Bressler
” “Unplugging IoT devices when making client calls isn’t irrational, but practical for mitigating risk, agreed Stroock & Stroock & Lavan chief information officer Neeraj Rajpal. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Stroock memo delves into that question, and it turns out – as usual when it comes to coverage issues – the answer is pretty complicated, but the bottom line is don’t bet on it. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:02 pm by Rob Robinson
Previously, he was the Director of Litigation Support for Stroock, and prior to that he led eDiscovery projects at Skadden Arps. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:57 pm by Bob Ambrogi
Quartararo was director of litigation support services at the law firm Stroock & Stroock & Lavan until 2018, where he was responsible for the development and implementation of firm policy on e-discovery, information governance and technology support and the design and delivery of e-discovery and application-specific training programs. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428, 429 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016] [the “gross speculation of future events” in the plaintiffs’ allegations were insufficient to satisfy “but for” causation element required to state malpractice claim]). [read post]