Search for: "Succession of Doll v. Doll" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
Sir Richard’s 2002 paper is in a sense a scientific autobiography about some successes in discerning causal associations from observational studies. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
“Although the point was not argued before me, there was a significant possibility that a robustly argued application might have been successful. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
The key study was conducted by Sir Richard Doll in 1955, which showed the association but only among those who had been overexposed in the early years of the manufacturing plant.[9] There was no causal inference claimed, and Doll had not controlled for smoking histories. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 11:18 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), remain the basis for every decision regarding obviousness,” noted Commissioner for Patents John Doll. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 2:36 am
RapidShare's business success is accomplished only with the knowing assistance of these two top search engines - Google and Microsoft's Bing (see above photo). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Most noticeable there is the ongoing Costco v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:30 am by James Kachmar
”  Following the Rogers decision, the Ninth Circuit applied it to dispose of trademark infringement claims involving Barbie dolls (Matel, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:34 pm by Russell Beck
(sometimes called the “Bratz case” because the dispute concerns the Bratz dolls). [read post]