Search for: "Super Castings v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Neil Kinkopf
  First, there is real opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:49 pm by Mark Jaycox and rainey Reitman
"  The bill includes a new emergency clause for the Attorney General, allowing for surveillance of a targeted suspect who enters the United States for 72 hours or until a new surveillance order is obtained. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
  The rationale behind this bill should be obvious, especially in light of the Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
  The rationale behind this bill should be obvious, especially in light of the Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
Political Attack Ads, Often Negative, Try Instead to Accentuate the Positive New York Times – Ashley Parker | Published: 4/17/2014 Some of the best-known super PACs and outside political groups are making an effort to cast the candidates they support in an appealing way instead of solely attacking opponents. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
And the United States Supreme Court and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
Voters backed by a liberal super PAC in Wisconsin have targeted three of those—Sen. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm by Rachel Brown, Wenqing Zhao
Xu, a deputy division director with the MSS’s Jiangsu State Security Department, is the first Chinese intelligence officer to be extradited for prosecution in the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Ernesto Falcon
When we look back at the United States’ previous move from telecom monopoly into what can best be described as “regulated competition,” we can learn a lot of lessons—good and bad—about what can be done post-breakup. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
 First, traditional approaches to scrutiny are cast aside. [read post]