Search for: "Sweeney v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:58 am
He got that from the part in Sweeney discussing State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 3:31 pm
Interview with Tim Cook on Sway, April 5 2021 In the United States, the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:25 am
Defendants sought to remove the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Sweeney, David B. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
Sweeney draws attention to Apple's behavior and double standards. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:30 am
In Couzzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am
Apple--will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday, October 21, 2022. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:28 am
It's truly impressive that Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney and the executive director of the Coalition for App Fairness (which Epic co-founded) were able to discuss mobile app store issues at a Korean event ("The Global Conference for Mobile Application Ecosystem Fairness") with high-ranking politicians from Korea, Europe (French Secretary of State for Digital Affairs Cédric O, who happens to be half-Korean), and the United States (Republican… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
Sweeney, supra. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:06 am
We recently reported (see our earlier blog article) the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims in BLR Group of America, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm
United States, an important takings case decided by the Federal Circuit last year. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm
CAAF also granted review in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
In this way, any interference was of his own making (this argument had been deployed and accepted in McFeeley v United Kingdom (1980) 3 EHRR 161). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:45 am
There are over 3,300 Papa John’s restaurants in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Sweeney, Steven L. [read post]
