Search for: "T. R. T." Results 41 - 60 of 304,457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 11:36 am by Reference Staff
AI legal research can be a helpful starting point but shouldn’t be the final step.https://medium.com/media/7b72b75d592a9fd97853a939f4314796/hrefLibrary ResourcesAutomating Legal Services: Justice Through Technology (2019) by Hugh LogueThe Lawyer’s Guide to Working Smarter with Knowledge Tools (2021) by Marc LauritsenThe Threats of Algorithms and AI to Civil Rights, Legal Remedies, and American Jurisprudence: One Nation Under Algorithms (2020) by Alfred R. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:20 am by Vann Attorneys PLLC
Don't miss this opportunity to enhance your understanding and navigate the complexities of enforcing foreign judgments effectively. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 10:46 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
If allies don’t align, Chinese firms could simply acquire comparable foreign semiconductor components and equipment to circumvent the U.S. rules. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:53 am by Rebecca Hamilton
If we want compensation, their punishment, and such things, I don’t think we get ou[r] justice. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Joshua Weisenfeld
However, the Federal Circuit disagreed, reasoning that “[r]equiring a terminal to take responsive action differs meaningfully from requiring either the terminal or the portable device to take responsive action. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
” Counterman was charged for this behavior under a Colorado statute that criminalized “[r]epeatedly … mak[ing] any form of communication with another person” in “a manner that would cause a reasonable person to suffer serious emotional distress and does cause that person … to suffer serious emotional distress. [read post]