Search for: "TAYLOR v. UNION COUNTY" Results 41 - 60 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
”The county told Monroe and his union that Monroe’s dispute over the return to work order was governed by Article XI of the county’s procedures. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
This was demonstrated in the Appellate Division’s ruling in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals held in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Legislative intent controls in applying personnel rules providing for the liquidation of sick leave accruals upon separation from serviceCounty of Broome v Badger, 2008 NY Slip Op 08230, decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentInitially the Broom County Legislature adopted a personnel rule setting out the payment that would be made to administrative employees [i.e., unrepresented personnel within the meaning of the Taylor Law] for unused sick time… [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:16 am
Education Law §3813 notice of claim involving “a matter of personal interest” distinguished from vindicating a “matter of public interest”Matter of Harris v Board of Educ., Union Springs Cent. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
Another case, Taylor v Hammondsport CSD, 267 A.D.2d 987, brought by a teacher, David C. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Dismissed probationary teacher presents evidence sufficient to require judicial review of whether termination was made in bad faithLisa Capece f/k/a Lisa Grande v Schultz, 2009 NY Slip Op 51679(U), Decided on August 3, 2009, Supreme Court, Richmond County, Judge Philip G. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 4:31 am
Stay of arbitrationTown of Hempstead v CSEA Local 1000, Supreme Court, Nassau County, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]Under what circumstances will a court issue an order barring a grievance from being submitted to arbitration? [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:12 am
In contrast, in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929, a Suffolk County employee won reinstatement with full retroactive salary and contract benefits because the court determined that he was improperly dismissed while serving a disciplinary probation period. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:54 am
"After taking the foregoing considerations into account, GOER concluded that Cushing was not required to perform out-of-title work.As judicial review of GOER's determination in this context is limited to whether it is arbitrary, capricious or without any rational, the court concluded that in “the absence of compelling evidence establishing that [Cushing] performed distinctive aspects of the NA1 job title that differentiated it from the N2 job title,” there was no basis for… [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" Accordingly, ruled the court, the County was not required to comply with the determination of Weed's supervisor, who initially sustained Weed's grievance. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am by MOTP
Inconsistently, the Contract invokes both the TGAA and the FAA and also contemplates litigation and specifies the county in which any litigation and/or arbitration is to take place: Nueces County. [read post]