Search for: "TECHNICAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC." Results 41 - 60 of 811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 2:46 pm by Eric Schweibenz
On April 19, 2010, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP (“Georgia Pacific”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Since early March, the product notoriously known as "pink slime," Beef Products Inc.'s lean finely textured beef, has come under an unprecedented amount of scrutiny from most everyone who eats. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 9:35 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Body Action Design, Inc., 846 F.2d 727, 728 (Fed. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
One perhaps quixotic result is that UCL standing may be unavailable if the defendant’s product is worthless—since a consumer would never want to buy a worthless product again—but available if the product is worth something, just not as much as the defendant charged for it. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 3:56 am
In re Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Serial No. 86954703 (October 25, 2017) [not precedential]. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 10:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(I’m not sure the first is technically possible, but I also don’t think it’s unreasonable for consumers not to know that.) [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 12:45 pm by WIMS
According to the announcement, the use of Green Chemistry and Engineering in the market strategies of businesses throughout the Great Lakes region is growing as companies look for ways to meet consumer demand for products and processes that are more sustainable. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:41 am by Hannah Lepow and Jayne Ponder
On April 6, 2020, Tapplock, Inc., a Canadian maker of internet-connected smart locks, entered into a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) to resolve allegations that the company deceived consumers by falsely claiming that it had implemented reasonable steps to secure user data and that its locks were “unbreakable. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:25 am by Eric Schweibenz
”  The complaint defines SK America, Inc. d/b/a/ Maxlite, U Lighting America, Inc., Feit Electric Company, Inc., General Electric Company, and Technical Consumer Products, Inc. as importers, distributors and/or sellers of infringing dimmable CFLs manufactured abroad, namely in China. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “The Defendants’ argument is flawed as it relies on a technicality that ignores the practical effect of their decision to allegedly list themselves as a seller on an Eagle Flight product detail page and, consequently, to advertise and sell products using the Eagle Flight mark to consumers. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Whole Foods Market Services, Inc., 2014 WL 5315030,  No. 4:13–CV–3517 (S.D. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“[A] party’s attempt to pass off another party’s product as its own satisfies the confusion requirement of the Lanham Act for an obvious reason—it represents a direct attempt to confuse a consumer about the origin of a product. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:29 am by Sean Wajert
Nor is the right to challenge class membership a mere technicality, noted PLAC. [read post]