Search for: "THOMAS v. FORD MOTOR CO." Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1052 (Pa. 2016). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle
That framing recapitulates a key point in Gorsuch’s concurrence in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
" Nationwide Class Action Reinstated Against Ford Motor Over Accelerator Pedals The American Lawyer The Oklahoma Supreme Court last week reinstated a nationwide class action against Ford Motor Co. and auto parts maker Williams Controls that contends that certain models of Ford Super Duty pickup trucks and Expedition SUVs contain faulty accelerator pedals. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
Ford Spared Liability for Defect in Retrofitted Truck Rear Bumper New Jersey Law Journal Ford Motor Co. is off the hook for an $11.8 million product liability judgment in a crashworthiness suit over a chassis cab's faulty rear bumper safety device. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016). [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Bayer Corp., 398 F.3d 640, 643 (7th Cir. 2005) (applying Illinois law); Thomas v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
Likewise, five African-American employees were allowed to proceed on their retaliation and hostile environment claims based, in part, on an allegation that, after a coworker filed an EEOC charge on behalf of herself and a “class of Black employees,” they were given excessive workloads as compared to non-African-American workers (Rogers v Ford Motor Co). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
IN ADMIRALTY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAINTENANCE AND CURE This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing, before the Court, sitting without a jury, on May 14, 2015. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am by Lara
Anchor Motors in hot water for selling fake Harley truck. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the district court erred in using the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]