Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Cunningham"
Results 41 - 60
of 175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 10:25 pm
In People v Giles (2008 NY Slip Op 09433 [12/2/08]), the Court of Appeals issued an important decision regarding the application of Molineux. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:38 am
The decision in Cunningham v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:51 am
Defendant hung around some bad people. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 12:55 pm
The opinion is today's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
Wachovia, and Cunningham v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
Judge Cunningham dissented. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Installing Global Positioning System equipment in devices use by employees during workEl-Nahal v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 8:06 am
The state of Ohio had asked the justices to overturn a ruling by the 6th Circuit in favor of Jeronique Cunningham, who was sentenced to death for the murders of three people. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:18 am
Fine is presiding over State of Texas v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
One such citation was a repeat of the Cunningham quote. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:33 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court decided Jeffrey Cookson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm
See People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
The cases decided to date are People (DPP) v Cunningham [2012] IECCA 64, People (DPP) v Kavanagh [2012] IECCA 65, and People (DPP) v Barry O’Brien [2012] IECCA 68, and in each case the Court of Criminal Appeal has overturned the original conviction and ordered retrials. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
Judge Penny Cunningham dissented for the reasons set forth in her dissent in the appellate decision in State v. [read post]
