Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Lewis"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2009, 4:43 pm
On July 14, 2009, the Court of Appeals published its Per Curiam Opinion in the consolidated matters of State of Michigan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 1:45 pm
Homeless Charity v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Cuomo v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
On March 4, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals approved its opinion in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
(The following essay by IntLawGrrl Hope Lewis is cross-posted from a SCOTUSblog symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 11:32 am
Carp, People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
Clearly, this is an example of a search which just didn’t hack it.To download a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:53 pm
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals entered an opinion in Lewis v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Lewis, 69 N.Y.2d 321 [1987]). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:35 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:30 pm
Source: www.legaleducation.org.ukSalem Alshdaifat’s attorney also filed an omnibus motion in the matter of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
However, I was blown away by Scott Heiser’s presentation during the panel, The People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Thompson of the Second District Court of Appeal is famous for his acrostic jibe at the dissent in People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Thompson of the Second District Court of Appeal is famous for his acrostic jibe at the dissent in People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:28 am
Although attorneys for both sides in Bro-Tech v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:13 am
In Warner v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
On December 15, 2011, the Florida Supreme Court released an interesting opinion in Del Valle v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 2:26 pm
In late March 2021, the Labor and Industry Review Commission released Lewis v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:48 am
Chief Justice Roberts posed a hypothethical in which the rules of the arbitration forum (selected by the employer) allowed a class arbitration, but only if there were 51 or more people who joined. [read post]
