Search for: "The Supreme Court of Virginia"
Results 41 - 60
of 12,959
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Markham notes that, under the major questions doctrine, articulated last year by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:00 am
I went to the wrong public law school in Virginia. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Administrative law is almost certain to undergo monumental change during the Supreme Court’s current Term. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am
Virginia; that is, it predates the current trans movement. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:00 am
For example, this one concerns the impact of the flag news on perceptions of the Supreme Court's ability to impartially adjudicate cases arising out of the 2020 election, including most prominently, Trump's claim that he is absolutely immune from prosecution. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:05 am
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:30 am
Regner, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, on Monday, May 13, 2024 Tags: Court of Chancery, delaware, Delaware Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court, Disclosure, Inovalon, Nordic Capital Seven Questions about Proxy Advisors Posted by David F. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:30 am
Regner, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, on Monday, May 13, 2024 Tags: Court of Chancery, delaware, Delaware Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court, Disclosure, Inovalon, Nordic Capital Seven Questions about Proxy Advisors Posted by David F. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
Justice Clarence Thomas Calls Criticism of Him ‘Nastiness’ and Lies’ MSN – Justin Jouvenal, Tobi Raji, and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 5/10/2024 After facing harsh questions about his judicial decisions and acceptance of lavish gifts from a billionaire, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas pushed back at his critics, saying he and his wife, Virginia Thomas, have endured “nastiness” and “lies. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am
What are the most important Supreme Court decisions in environmental law? [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:37 pm
Soon after the Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:01 am
From the 1960s onward, the Supreme Court has even given First Amendment protection to things like a swastika-brandishing neo-Nazi march through a Jewish community, a cross burning on a Black family's lawn, and Ku Klux Klan demonstrations. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:06 am
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals denied a petition for an emergency suspension of an already-suspended attorney We do not intend our denial of the current petition to be deemed critical of ODC’s action in filing a petition for... [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
They rely on the equal sovereignty principle, which the Supreme Court applied in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:14 am
In 1875, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected Minor's assertion, ruling that voting was not a right of national citizenship. [read post]
9 May 2024, 8:55 am
Abraham (University of Virginia School of Law) has posted Free Speech, Breathing Space, and Liability Insurance on SSRN. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court explained… [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:14 pm
In 1875, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected Minor's assertion, ruling that voting was not a right of national citizenship. [read post]
