Search for: "Thomas N Duke"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Duke Power Gun control Guns Guns Guns and demonstrations Gunslingers Hamas Hamas Happy holidays Harassment Hard-working Harm Harris v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:18 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 10:25 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:24 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:36 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020, Pre-Publication available here Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 4:25 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020, Pre-Publication available here Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:17 am
n? [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
On Aug. 31, his last day in office, Judge Thomas Griffith, joined by Judge Karen Henderson, issued a majority opinion holding that the House’s lawsuit should be dismissed. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
As Regents explains, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Acting DHS Secretary Elaine Duke rested the decision to rescind the DACA Memorandum on a legal conclusion—specifically, a judgment that “DACA” suffered from the same legal defects identified by the Fifth Circuit in litigation over the later DAPA policy. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:24 am
$137,165 $147,635 $72,100 2202 Duke Univ [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am
Yeshiva University Benjamin N. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jacob Charles looks at the implications of Rehaif v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost looks at Thomas’ concurring opinion in Gamble, in which Thomas asserted that “the Supreme Court is constitutionally bound to give a precedent no weight whatsoever if the prior decision is, in his 20-20 hindsight, ‘demonstrably erroneous. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:41 am
• Thomas E. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:41 am
• Thomas E. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:45 am
The remainder are in California (7), New York (3), the DC area (3), and Florida (2), along with Thomas M. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Doron Dorfman, Syracuse University College of Law, Of Worthy and Worthier Blood: Gay Families, Anti-HIV Medication, and the Blood Ban Doriane Lambelet Coleman, Duke Law School, Legal Issues in Decision-making for Adolescents Who Seek Gender Affirming Care F. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
However, Justice Thomas’s dissent argued that the majority’s broad deference to legislative judgment was to “effectively to delete the words ‘for public use’ from the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am
Forsythe & Bradley N. [read post]
