Search for: "Thomas v. Arnold"
Results 41 - 60
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:25 am
However, in the case of American Science & Engineering Inc. v Rapiscan Systems Limited [2016] EWHC 756 (Pat), handed down on 11 April 2016, both sides appear to have at least tried to follow the guidance set out by Arnold J in Medimmune Limited v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 8:38 am
The case is Oliver v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:57 am
Trade marks From the other side of the Atlantic, GuestKat Thomas Key shared a judgment from the 9th Circuit on the use of trade marks in expressive works. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:31 am
I Social media, "WikiLeaks" and false news in the 18th century: Thomas Jefferson and the "Mazzei letter" I Does the economic impact of SPCs necessitate SPC Regulation reform? [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 8:04 am
Plus, in Footnote 4 the court noted that the receiver agreed to a cap on the law firm’s hourly rates, and that the rates were ‘reasonable.'” Arnold v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:06 pm
Rather, it is the Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling in Keller v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:06 am
It's about how to apply the Huawei v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Thomas, programming chair and blogger extraordinaire. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Wathelet gives Nestlé application a bit of stickCJEU’s Advocate General Wathelet delivered his Opinion in the keenly-awaited dispute in Case C‑215/14Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd, a reference from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales [noted by the IPKat here and here]. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:01 am
Eine völkerrechtliche Überprüfung Björn Elberling, Protection Against Expulsion Under the European Convention on Human Rights – Beyond Soering and Family Life Thomas Giegerich, Demise of a ›Legal Lohengrin‹? [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:59 pm
Bently's argument that the focus in eBay v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
This was the point of Justice Thomas’ very first question to Jason Murray, and it was a recurring theme throughout the argument. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:01 am
The Supreme Court in its recent NIFLA v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:24 pm
Also in today's Post, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Governor Jodi Rell have this op-ed on the need for progress on greenhouse gas emissions in the wake of the Court's Mass v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:58 am
Horowitz v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
On February 20, 2008, in an 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Preston v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
., Ltd. lost a trade mark infringement case regarding its ‘Double C’ logo in China.Katfriend Thomas Key reports on the recent decision of the US Supreme Court in Iancu v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
