Search for: "Thomas v. Internal Revenue Service" Results 41 - 60 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
SHIREY Opinion of the Court – 3 – (“Cornelius Property”) for sale and split the net sale proceeds; and for Husband to pay debt owed by the Shireys to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in the amount of $159,163.83. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Thomas argued that the taxpayer had arguably received the benefits of Cook County services, and was now trying to minimize taxes. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Mila Sohoni
Internal Revenue Service, a unanimous U.S. [read post]
The states claimed that their burden has been increased by paperwork from increased healthcare enrollment and Internal Revenue Service reporting. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Section 1400N(d)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code allows a special depreciation deduction for “qualified Golf Opportunity Zone property. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand-downs will be streamed on Supreme Court Live and will then be made available on the Supreme Court’s video on demand service. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The hand-down will be streamed on Supreme Court Live and will then be made available on the Supreme Court’s video on demand service. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
When Boule asked Egbert to leave his property and attempted to intervene, Egbert shoved him to the ground; when Boule complained to Egbert’s superiors, Egbert allegedly contacted the Internal Revenue Service and state agencies, resulting in a tax audit and investigations of Boule’s activities. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:51 pm by Rich McHugh
  Specifically, the Court’s opinion upholds a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that subsidies should be available both in states that have set up their own exchanges and in other states in which residents must purchase coverage through the federal government exchange. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Thomas (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, March 9, 2018 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Hedge funds, In re Revlon, In re Trulia, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Unocal v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
After the filing of the returns and payment of taxes, the Internal Revenue Service will generally send some type of estate closing letter accepting the return. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
It also encompasses “any revenue lost, cost incurred, or other consequential damages incurred because of interruption of service. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm by Daniel Hemel
The answer for federal income tax purposes is clear: Compensatory damages for physical injuries are excluded from gross income under Section 104 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
   The papers at issue in the case are tax liability documents prepared by an in-house Textron attorney, and demanded by the Internal Revenue Service during a routine audit of the company’s returns. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand-downs will be streamed on Supreme Court Live and will then be made available on the Supreme Court’s video on demand service. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Depends on how we see the world https://t.co/dk2pbJQTYd -> How the Liberal ‘revenue neutral’ tax plan could cost billions and could push top talent south https://t.co/Wng7ZyEXO0 -> Beastie Boys | Beastie Boys Resolve Copyright Battle With Monster https://t.co/FHKEohAemE -> Troubling, but true, How does misinformation spread online? [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Wright, another standing case from the 1980s, the Court held that plaintiffs could not sue the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for continuing to give tax-exempt status to many schools that failed to desegregate and discriminated on the basis of race, in violation of the law. [read post]