Search for: "Turner v. Baker" Results 41 - 60 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm by Daniel Richardson
State, 166 Vt. 246 (1997)(school funding law unconstitutional); Baker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
  Finally, at Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost suggests that the federal government in its ACA briefs is trying to appeal to Justice Kennedy by citing to his five-to-four opinion in Turner Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
  In Michael Turner’s case, however, an extradition took place even though no decision had yet been made to prosecute him. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:35 am
  Although Baker died before the significance of his observations became known, his faithful traveling companion – an Irish Setter who often flew shotgun – was immortalized by a geologist who dubbed the creek Baker had spotted “Red Dog” creek.' The story of Red Dog Mine is a page turner in its own right. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Ct., 12-0076, 9/2/2010 Tab TurnerTurner & Associates, P.A, North Little Rock, Ark. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by INFORRM
According to Sedley LJ (with whom Sir Scott Baker agreed), the rule had “passed beyond redemption by the courts” [27] and was “anomalous, frequently otiose and, where not otiose, unjust” [31]. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:58 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The first day of March brings a whole group of authors discussing the implications of today's Stab v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
Clark exercised that option and then licensed the broadcast to Turner Broadcasting System. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm by Marvin Ammori
Turner II did so not by applying strict scrutiny for "content-based" rules (a wise choice), nor by applying a lower scrutiny (such as the scrutiny in FCC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am by Marvin Ammori
Second, if it's content-neutral, does it pass the judicial test set forth in Supreme Court cases decided in the 1990s pertaining to the relationship between cable and broadcast television, Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]