Search for: "U. S. v. Davis#"
Results 41 - 60
of 425
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Redding, Islamic Challenges to Pakistan’s Transgender Rights Law, (10 Melbourne Asia Review (2022)).William Wagner, Amicus Brief in Kennedy v Bremerton School District, (U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Jackson Women's Health Center, (U of St. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:02 pm
Pursuant to the Supreme Court's recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Davis, 27 Ohio App. 3d 65 (1985). [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
Davis said the technology’s “advanced surveillance capabilities such as facial recognition, person tracking and gender identification” could threaten civil liberties and potentially national security. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm
See Davis ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:25 am
Davis, 531 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
” 3 KENNETH DAVIS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE, § 20.04 at 74 (1958); accord, Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
U’s registration for THE for clothing and other merchandise by putting THE on a hangtag. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:43 am
The panel noted that prosecutors often try to introduce evidence highly probative of guilt “[u]nder the guise of explaining why police began their investigation or conducted it a certain way. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court suggests why that is a mistake on North Carolina’s part.In Berger v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in in 1960 in Clay v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 10:20 am
Davis, 580 U. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
” Estate of Davis v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
S. ___ (2020); Wise v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
That said, under the U. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Part Two detailed the line of Supreme Court precedent going back more than a century rejecting ISL premises, at least in federal election contexts (as distinguished from other places the Constitution refers to state “legislatures”), including Davis v. [read post]
