Search for: "U.S. Venture, Inc. v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2022, 9:33 am
United States, 161 Ct. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm
United States, 959 F.2d 1558, 1561 (11th Cir. 1992). [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
United States, 141 S. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:19 am
Case date: 20 April 2022 Case number: No. 18-916 Court: Supreme Court of the United States A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:45 am
Case date: 01 June 2022 Case number: No 21-1107 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm
See Aetna Health, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm
See Aetna Health, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am
For example, in Relentless Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am
Sundance, Inc. and Shinn v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Over the past two years, U.S. public companies faced an unpredictable risk environment. [read post]
2 May 2022, 12:59 pm
Wells Elecs., Inc., 525 U.S. 55 (1998). [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm
By “valid mark,” I mean a mark that meets the requirements for one in the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
” Ramara, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:36 am
Brief for United States, HP Inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 12:12 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
The U.S. payments market is the world’s most competitive. . . . [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
In PruneYard, for instance, the Court stressed that "no specific message is dictated by the State to be displayed on appellants' property. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:01 am
See Global Material Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
