Search for: "U.S. v. Jones (frank E.)" Results 41 - 52 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Issues: Frank Jones, one of Speed’s frequent investors, demanded Speed return the $4 million Jones invested in December 2019. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
The next day, ABC World News was on the story, reporting that 70 percent of U.S. ground beef contained LFTB. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Intellectual PropertyK1401 .O2 2010 No.5The U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]