Search for: "U.S. v. Mitchell (james)" Results 41 - 60 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
How about the IT staffs at the district, circuit, and national levels who are tasked with maintaining the computers and other digital equipment that make the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Harry Graver
” According to Bamzai (as well as Alito and Gorsuch), the answer is no: The CAAF is not a “court,” in the constitutional sense, any more than was James Madison in Marbury v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Rachel Bercovitz
James Mitchell proposed a suite of enhanced interrogation methods in a 2002 memorandum. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm by Alex Potcovaru
The Times obtained and published recordings of depositions of John Bruce Jessen and James Mitchell, the psychologists alleged to be the architects of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation program. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
James Connell that no additional action was required on motion 245, regarding a potential revision in expert procedure. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:55 am by Marty Lederman
”  In her controlling opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Robert Loeb, Emma Kohse
The Obama administration’s forbearance on asserting the state secrets privilege in Salim v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:30 am by Emma Kohse
Defendants James Mitchell and John “Bruce” Jessen maintained that, as government contractors, they were agents of the United States for purposes of the statute. [read post]