Search for: "UNION CARBIDE CORP." Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2008, 12:42 am
Union Carbide Corp., 2d Cir., No. 06-5694, 11/3/08. 23 Toxics Law Reporter 984. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:34 am
Cir. 2005) (271(f) "component" applies to method claims and software being sold abroad); Union Carbide v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
" This decision overruled a 2005 Federal Circuit decision on the same issue, Union Carbide Chems. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:20 pm
Brown, a 48-year-old former oil field "roughneck," argued that Brown had inhaled asbestos dust on the job, and that the manufacturers and sellers of the asbestos (defendants Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. and Union Carbide Corp.) failed to take proper steps to warn of the dangers of the materials. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:40 pm by Colin O'Keefe
" - Newark, NJ attorney John Klock of Gibbons on the firm's Real Property & Environmental Law Alert Ninth Circuit Gives Green-light to Google AdWords' Use of Competitors' Marks - New Jersey lawyer Joe Bahgat on his blog, The Sports & Entertainment Law Playbook Flood the Farm or the City: The Army Corps of Engineers’ Tough Question - Omaha, Nebraska attorney Sean Minahan of Lamson, Dugan and Murray on his blog,… [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm by Arkady Itkin
For instance, the court in Drinkwater v Union Carbide Corp. held that even though the employee was not able to establish a hostile work environment claim based on a few isolated incidents, she was able to make a retaliation claim, because she reasonably and in good faith believed that the harassers highly offensive sexual remarks constituted harassment when she made a protected complaint about the same to her higher management. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm by Arkady Itkin
For instance, the court in Drinkwater v Union Carbide Corp. held that even though the employee was not able to establish a hostile work environment claim based on a few isolated incidents, she was able to make a retaliation claim, because she reasonably and in good faith believed that the harassers highly offensive sexual remarks constituted harassment when she made a protected complaint about the same to her higher management. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 10:13 am by Sheppard Mullin
Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 370 U.S. 690, 698-99 (1962) (antitrust plaintiff “should be given the full benefit of [its] proofs without tightly compartmentalizing the various factual components and wiping the slate clean after scrutiny of each”). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 370 U.S. 690, 696, 8 L. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 9:14 pm
,Industrial Holdings Corp., Ogelbay Norton,KCG, Owens-Illinois, Murcowall Products, Rapid American, Parsons E&C, RPM Inc., Union Carbide, and TWC Valve. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:04 am by Dennis Crouch
The particular claims at issue in Union Carbide are as follows: 1. [read post]