Search for: "US v. Al Smith"
Results 41 - 60
of 932
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Fang, V. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Moreover, Tørsløv et al. (2022) document that 36 percent of multinational profits are shifted to tax havens globally. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
LaFave et al., Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 2.1(e) (6th ed. 2020). [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
Supreme Court held that it would violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment for Colorado to force a website designer to create a wedding website for a same-sex couple, because it would compel her to create speech in which she did not believe (303 Creative LLC, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
We will further consider your failure to inform you’re assured of the within offer to settle as evidence of bad faith under the recent case of Smith, et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:59 am
The Strong Friends LLC et al. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
City of Seattle (Judicial futility doctrine and removal from state court to federal court) Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 3/20/23:Smith v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
” When one of us (Andy) worked for Vice President Al Gore, a significant portion of the Office of Vice President staff was paid for out of the Senate budget, and those staff members had to abide by a different set of ethics rules than the Executive Branch staff. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
The statistics chapter in the third edition, nonetheless, confusingly suggested that “a particular study may use a method that is entirely appropriate but that is so poorly executed that it should be inadmissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 702. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm
Then Apple brought another motion to dismiss, and a few hours ago filed its reply in support of that motion:Affinity Credit Union et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 1:46 pm
The plaintiffs in Hughes et al v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Bin Laden, Smith v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
DON SMITH, Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:12 am
In fact, L’Abbate moved to be relieved as Marcum’s counsel due to the potential conflict and the motion was not decided because the Litigation settled two days after it was filed (see Conway v Marcum & Kliegman, LLP, et al, NY County (Index No. 652236/2014), Dkt Nos. 605, 611, 617). [read post]
