Search for: "US v. C. Berry" Results 41 - 60 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
David Egilman’s testimony was his use of a 1972 NIOSH study that apparently quantified exposure in terms of fibers per cubic centimeter, without specifying whether all fibers in the measurement were asbestos fibers, as opposed to non-asbestos fibers, including talc fibers. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Mary Frances Berry, the Geraldine R. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:28 am
The court, Judge Morrison England, Jr.,  also pointed out that the plaintiff acknowledged in her opposition to the motion to dismiss that "[c]lose inspection [of the box] reveals that Crunchberries . . . are not really berries. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Iceland Foods Ltd v Berry (Valuation Officer), heard 25 Jan 2018. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm by Marketing
This option is most effectively used when there was a legal error in the decision. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 201(b)(2) and 201(c)(2), the Court takes judicial notice of the offered documents.[2]C. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:21 pm
PatLit's David Berry regales us with a warning from the US that delay in re-examination of a patent can result in litigation laches. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:50 pm
 DDR Holdings v Hotels.com is a fascinating post-Alice case on US patent-eligibility, involving an invention directed towards merchandising on the internet: David Berry writes it up for PatLit here. [read post]