Search for: "US v. Farrell" Results 41 - 60 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2015, 4:15 am by Timothy Edgar
  While I share Peter’s views of the value of intelligence, I see no way for the US to continue to employ section 702 for general “foreign affairs” surveillance after the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The following evidence summary tells us that plaintiff gets off to a good start in pursuing the lawsuit:Plaintiff has raised a genuine issue of fact regarding whether Officers Michael Farrell and Joseph Lopa intentionally or recklessly made misstatements and falsehoods in the warrant affidavit. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm by INFORRM
The use of social media by students to criticise their courses and teachers gives rise to difficult freedom of expression issues. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:19 am
Keneally Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith v. 38   Of course, Jimmie knew, Farrell was not normal and had once begun to caress him.1990   Lesbian & Gay Pride 11/4   Back west in a long standing ‘normal’ society like old Blighty, many lesbian or gay teachers go in fear of exposure.Andrew Sullivan called his 1995 book "Virtually Normal. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 8:32 am
Keneally Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith v. 38 Of course, Jimmie knew, Farrell was not normal and had once begun to caress him. 1990 Lesbian & Gay Pride 11/4 Back west in a long standing ‘normal’ society like old Blighty, many lesbian or gay teachers go in fear of exposure. [read post]
4 May 2007, 9:38 pm
American Cyanamid Co., 774 F.2d 448, 454 (CAFC 1985), but not the demise of In re Deuel (or O'Farrell). [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:55 pm
The Business-Standard reports: The Indian pharmaceutical industry, especially the generic pharma segment, seems pleased with this development [KSR v. [read post]
In An NHS Trust v Y  [2018] UKSC 46; [2018] 3 WLR 751, a leap-frog appeal from the judgment of O’Farrell J in the Queen’s Bench Division:  [2017] EWHC 2866 (QB), 4 WLR 222,  the single issue in the appeal was whether a court order must always be obtained before clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (“CANH”), which is keeping a person with a prolonged disorder of consciousness (“PDOC”) alive, can be withdrawn, or whether, in… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 6:22 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Today's Honolulu Star-Advertiser carries a story on the Hawaii Supreme Court's opinion in Hamilton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 9:38 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKTorts McDonald's Worker Loses Use of Image Claim Over Four-Second Clip in 'Super Size Me' Movie Candelaria v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:04 pm
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog Georgia man first to be executed following Baze v. [read post]