Search for: "US v. Fitch" Results 41 - 60 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2018, 6:04 am by Joy Waltemath
That said, the court reversed the grant of summary judgment against their failure-to-accommodate claim, finding a triable question on whether Kellogg reasonably accommodated them by requiring that, to avoid working on Sabbath, they use vacation or other accrued time off or find a qualified coworker to swap schedules (Tabura v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
§1064(3)).With arbitrary or fanciful marks, the word used as trade mark has its own meaning and it therefore has its own place in language (the Ninth Cirucit in this case used the example of the trade mark IVORY, which is a trade mark for soap but also is the material of the tusks of elephants Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:44 am by Dustin Carlton
  This so-called “holistic approach” was, however, rejected by the California Supreme Court in Kilby v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am by Jenny Gesley
It has been estimated by India Rating and Research (a credit rating agency and subsidiary of the FITCH Group) that with the ban of notes (worth a total of Rs.4 lakh crore, or about US$4,000 billion) in cash and fake currency, 12% of the black money will be terminated. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
Detective Sturgis enlisted Sergeant Fitch's help to set up the undercover purchase because Sergeant Fitch was more familiar and experienced with undercover buy operations of illegal purchases.North Carolina v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Abercrombie & Fitch (2015), which increased the protection given to a Muslim wearing a head scarf; and Smith v. [read post]
 To determine strength, courts place the mark on the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness most prominently discussed in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 11:05 am by L. Julius M. Turman
Supreme Court settled the issue as to whether an accommodation needs to be specifically requested by holding in EEOC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am by Guest Author
Clarifies that while the use of audio, video, or computer technology can be used in conjunction with classroom, webinar, or e-learning training, the use of such supplemental tools by themselves cannot fulfill the supervisor training requirements. (2 C.C.R. 11024(a)(2)). [read post]