Search for: "US v. Laurent"
Results 41 - 60
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:17 pm
Yves Saint Laurent case, with Yves Saint Laurent arguing that the Louboutin's red sole trademark was just a useful aesthetic feature of the design and therefore, could not be trademarked. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:28 pm
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:11 am
(Come on, I had to use it sometime!) [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
YSL's Tribute shoe R is for red: Last Thursday, the final order in the infamous Louboutin v Yves Saint Laurent case involving Louboutin’s red soles trade mark was entered in district court in the Southern District of New York (see previous AmeriKat reporting on the case here). [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:42 am
” Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:42 am
” Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
As background to the case, Louboutin had seen red and sued rival fashion house Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) in 2011 after YSL launched a pair of shoes with a red sole, which Louboutin is arguably famous for. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
As background to the case, Louboutin had seen red and sued rival fashion house Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) in 2011 after YSL launched a pair of shoes with a red sole, which Louboutin is arguably famous for. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Yves Saint Laurent Am. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
Yves Saint Laurent Am. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
First, the Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm
Written by Joseph DiCioccio The Second Circuit recently issued an opinion in the Louboutin v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:18 am
Highlights this week included: US: 2nd Circuit rules that color can serve as a trademark in the fashion industry, but limits scope of mark for red-soled shoes: Louboutin v Yves Saint Laurent (IP Spotlight) (IPKat) (PHOSITA) [...] [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
The AmeriKat snuggly asleep moments before the IPKat wakens her with news of the Louboutin judgment The AmeriKat was fast asleep in bed just now when her BlackBerry started vibrating off her bedside table with news that the long awaited judgment from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the Louboutin v Yves Saint Laurent case has just been published. [read post]
