Search for: "US v. Mark Wright"
Results 41 - 60
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
Wright, et al. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Courts, by contrast, decide “likelihood of confusion” based upon how a mark is used in the marketplace. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
So there is some hope that a policy statement would be useful. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
” EM Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
Consequently, the court arrived at an unequivocal conclusion that the defendants’ use of the BAYC marks for th [read post]
CAFC en banc in MARINE POLYMER v. HEMCON: an unusual and unfortunate approach to an important issue?
15 Mar 2012, 9:25 am
” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am
(internal quotation marks removed). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:20 am
First, back in 2008, in the UK High Court case of Hays v Ions, Mark Ions, a former employee of recruitment company Hays, was ordered to hand over details of contacts that he had migrated from his work email address book to his personal LinkedIn account. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
Cir. 2016); Wright v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:22 am
Its registration … required that it affirm that it had a bone fide intent to use the mark…. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 3:45 am
Closer to the mark the Supreme Court finds that as in Hand v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Among other things, Patel's papers discuss documents and recordings disclosed by GoDaddy demonstrating that: (1) John Steele's GoDaddy account was used to access a site registered to "Alan Cooper," (2) the same email address is used in connection with sites registered to "Alan Cooper," Mark Lutz, and John Steele, (3) recordings show the same male voice making tech support calls to GoDaddy and using the names John Steele, Alan Cooper, and Mark Lutz, (4) a… [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
Last week we invited Cathy Gellis to guest-post her observations of a hearing in AF Holdings v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
Defendant also claimed that Plaintiff did not have any license from Defendant to use the Wild Dunes Service Mark in his photograph, but he distributed the photograph for over a year as part of a package of pictures. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
From Murphy v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am
The first—Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2505 (“Wright & Miller”); and appellate courts rarely-if ever-vacate for failure to use a special verdict form, see Skidmore v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 1:37 pm
Chicago debates which have become largely political and lost economic meaning to most using the term. [read post]
