Search for: "US v. Mary King" Results 41 - 60 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Floyd Alexander-Hunt is an LLM candidate at Queen Mary University London and a research assistant at K [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
 Darren reports.* YouTube to defend clear examples of fair use, even in courtYouTube to litigate copyright infringement/fair use actions on behalf of users harassed by subject to inappropriate DMCA takedown requests? [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Floyd Alexander-Hunt is an LLM candidate at Queen Mary University London and a research assistant at King’s College London. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Judge King in Marya v Warner/Chapell Music determined that the copyright filed by Summy Co. in 1935 granted the rights to the specific piano arrangements of the music, not the music itself. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
Did you know that in 1935 applicant built the world’s largest grand piano, for the Silver Jubilee of King George V and Queen Mary? [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
Katfriend Marie-Gabrielle Plasseraud tells all.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am by Justin Walsh
Court Pos. 1 – Tim Davis   King County District Court Northeast Electoral Dist. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am by SHG
  And in the case raised by Andrew, Welch v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 3:32 am by John Hochfelder
A Kings County jury agreed with the plaintiff to an extent – it determined that the city was 60% at fault for the accident (and that plaintiff bore 40% of the fault). [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Also, he presents C5's 7th Forum, "Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation", which IPKat readers may attend with a Kat-reduction on the ticket.* Strategies for patenting biotech inventions: broad claims, changing contributions and data that didn’t make it into the specificationThis is the fourth post in series of Suleman’s Katguide on biotech inventions [the earlier posts can be found here (introductory), here (ethics) and here (case… [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:39 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
The term "offense" is only used for insults to the head of State, while "injures" is used for insults to everybody else. [read post]