Search for: "US v. Monell"
Results 41 - 60
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm
Citing the 1978 case Monell v. [read post]
Contents of Personal Computers and Email Accounts Within Scope of Discovery, Search Ordered by Court
28 Jun 2016, 1:13 pm
Sunderland v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:37 am
Arizona filed an interlocutory appeal of the injunction and the county sought review of the Monell holding (the appeal of the Monell issue was dismissed for lack of pendent jurisdiction). [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:16 pm
The Court does not tell us exactly how that "policy" exists in this case. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Ever since this blog started, we’vemadeplainthat we have no use for the so-called “heeding presumption. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 10:32 am
V., Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 12:25 pm
The case, Monell, et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:20 am
The employee’s Title VII retaliation claim advanced in part (Hasper v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
What would it take to meet the Monell requirements to hold a municipality liable? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Most warnings concern a product’s use – that if you use (or don’t use) the product in a certain way, you are likely to get hurt; and if you follow the warning, you won’t. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
The state claims were dismissed, but the plaintiffs will have their day in the court.For those of you that enjoy crime novels and the like, you really ought to read the opinion, which follows after the break at the bottom of the page.The decision is also useful to practitioners as it addresses both claim accrual issues (i.e., why these claims are not time barred), and Monell liability. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:58 pm
Unfortunately, it sometimes shelters them as well.Finally, there is what civil rights lawyers know as Monell (from the 1978 Supreme Court decision in Monell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 8:38 am
Involuntary transfers and an internal investigation also supported her claim (Thomas v County of Riverside, August 18, 2014, per curiam). [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:08 am
However, the motion for summary judgment was granted as to her Monell claim and her public accommodations claim (Abdul-Latif v County of Lancaster, January 2, 2014, Stengel, L). [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm
In Roberts v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:57 am
The question is whether you can sue the government in a Monell claim without naming individual defendants.The case is Askins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:36 am
To prove the liability of the City itself, the plaintiff had to show under the landmark case Monell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:53 am
Unfortunately, the state of the law is that to hold Chicago liable, plaintiff's must show it to be an accepted governmental practice under Monell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
Church of Universal Love and Music v. [read post]
