Search for: "US v. Spearman" Results 41 - 60 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The OBSCC found 24 regional police forces, the British Transport Police, the Civil Nuclear Constabulary, the Ministry of Defence and the National Crime Agency used CCTV cameras on their premises made by Chinese companies Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei, Taiwan’s Nuuo, or US-based Honeywell, which uses Chinese-made components. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Otuo v The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (heard 12-14 and 25 to 29 March, 1 and 15 April 2019 ( Richard Spearman QC). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Richard Spearman KC dismissed the defamation claim in Griffin v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 19 – 20 March 2024, there was a preliminary issues trial and application notice before Richard Spearman KC in the case of Rashid Naseer v Adil Farooq Raja QB-2022-002648. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
On the same day Richard Spearman QC heard an application in the case of Feyziyev v Radu On 17 October 2019 Griffiths J handed down judgment in Roundshield Partners LLP v Ciudad Real International Airport SL & Ors [2019] EWHC 2733 (QB) – the judgment noted that the claim for defamation was abandoned on the first day. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Next Week in the Courts  On 25 March 2019 Richard Spearman QC will resuming hearing the trial in Otuo v The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (previously heard 12-14 March 2019). [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Richard Spearman QC heard the libel trial in the case of Day v Chivers. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful –  Suneet Sharma. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Please let us know if you have any events which you would like to be listed. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
In addition to the damages, which the judge, Richard Spearman KC, said would be higher if not for the cap, the court also granted a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from repeating the allegations. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Data Protection and Data Privacy The European Commission announced this week  that it has agreed a new framework with the US for data flows between Europe and the US. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
On the same day Richard Spearman QC heard an application in the case of Delo v Wise Payments. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am by INFORRM
Our reporters tell us that there have been no “privacy injunctions”. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The lack of EU recognition or an adequacy decision means transfers involving Russian companies can only occur “using one of the other transfer instruments provided for in Chapter V (of the EU General Data Protection Regulation). [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
On the same say Richard Spearman QC handed down judgment in the case of Glenn v Kline [2021] EWHC 468 (QB). [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
” On 1 March 2019 there was an assessment of damages in the case of Grayling v North before Richard Spearman QC. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
On 27 November 2020 Richard Spearman QC handed down judgment in the case of Gerrard & Anor v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 3241 (QB). [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
” There was a post about the case on the Inforrm Blog by Hugh Tomlinson QC “Case Law: R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales, Police use of “automatic facial recognition technology unlawful”. [read post]