Search for: "USA v. Boards"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 2:45 am
However, the Board erred when it denied Sirona’s contingent motion to amend the claims of its patent, and that ruling of the Board was vacated, and the dispute remanded with instructions to the Board to reconsider in light of recent precedent (Sirona Dental Systems GmbH v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:08 am
Brittex, not Dollar, was the first to use that mark in connection with pawn brokerage and pawn shop services, said the court, and the Board provided no support for the notion that a registrant has priority as to a specific service it was second to offer just because it was first to offer a different specific service (Brittex Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
While the Federal Circuit largely affirmed the Board’s decision denying the petition for cancellation under the likelihood of confusion test because of laches and acquiescence with a four-year delay, the Federal Circuit vacated the Board’s decision, in part, because the Board erred in its acquired distinctiveness analysis (Brooklyn Brewery Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:49 am
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) did not err by declining to consider a patentee’s claim construction arguments raised for the first time at oral argument. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
KGAA v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 3:06 am
Standard Tools and Equipment Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
The Board v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:22 am
As she wrote in her dissent in Fresenius USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm
Cir. 2023)PureCircle USA Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:02 pm
Thus, the Board’s denial of GHC’s contingent motion to add new claim 74 was vacated and the dispute remanded for further proceedings (The General Hospital Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 pm
(Elbit Systems of America, LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:00 am
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi (eds,)€ 125 The post USA: IPCom GmbH & Co. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:30 pm
However, the court also ruled that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in invalidated some of the patent’s claims, rendered an interpretation of the term “broadcast” that was overly broad, and the court therefore reversed that decision and remanded the case (Arista Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:56 am
The board erred in analyzing the fame of the registered marks, third-party usage, and similarity of the marks. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Davis, Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:26 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:14 am
Any error in the Board’s claim construction was harmless and substantial evidence, including the claim language and expert testimony, supported the Board’s findings of motivation to combine (Bot M8 LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, vacating the Board’s decision and remanding. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
The court remanded the case to the Board to reconsider its selected genus and to conduct a genericness analysis in light of that genus (Real Foods Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
ALE USA, Inc. [read post]
