Search for: "USA v. John J. Powers" Results 41 - 60 of 118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
On the same date Tugendhat J gave judgment in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print [2015] EWHC 3677 (QB). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 26 October 2015, Warby J heard the appeals in the cases of Richardson v Facebook and Richardson v Google UK Ltd. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
 As Newman J wrote in her dissenting opinion "validity and infringement are distinct issues, bearing different burdens, different presumptions, and different evidence. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
After working for the Labour Party during this election campaign, he described the Tory press in the UK as more powerful and “much more aggressive” than Fox News in the USA. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2015, Warby J heard applications in the case of Simpson v MGN. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am by Tara Hofbauer
Christine Fair, Karl Kaltenthaler, and William J. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm by Ron Coleman
 John Welch wrote about this as far back as 2005: In [] J&J Snack Foods [Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
In The Paris Review, Joshua J. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
John Wiley, it held that copyright law could not be used to prevent the parallel importation into the USA of works lawfully made outside of the USA. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
John Wiley, it held that copyright law could not be used to prevent the parallel importation into the USA of works lawfully made outside of the USA. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
Obiter J provides an insightful look into: Justice and Security Bill ~ second reading in Lords Obiter J notes Liberty believes that the proposals are dangerous and unnecessary. [read post]