Search for: "United Fashions of Texas, LLC" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
When an LLC that owned the development borrowed money from the bank, it required the wives of the owners to sign the loan agreement, agreeing to be “primarily and unconditionally liable” for the debt, so the bank could pursue them first, before pursuing the LLC’s owners. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 2013 WL 5532767, at *7-8 (D. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
But Primus sees it differently: “I understand 96 seems incongruous,” the legal counsel for Primus, attorney Jeffrey Whittington of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLC, has said. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:57 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Western District of Texas: U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 7:59 am by Greg Mersol
  The fashion police, and now the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas say “no. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:46 pm by Lovechilde
., the vice chairman of the company and the “banker who battled the Obama administration over the restructuring of Chrysler LLC. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am by Marie Louise
(Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog)   US Patents No patent for claimed method of patenting (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Disqualifying plaintiff’s litigation counsel based upon former joint defense agreement: In re Shared Memory Graphics LLC (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC: No evidence for priority claim: Cordance v Amazon (IPBiz) CAFC dismisses for lack of jurisdiction: Spread Spectrum v Eastman Kodak (IPBiz) District Court E D Texas: Email… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]