Search for: "United States Supreme Court, any and all Judicial Officers thereof"
Results 41 - 60
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
In the Cohen case, Justice Charles Fried of the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that Congress was effectively implementing state debtor-creditor laws when it enacted Medicaid trust laws: “We are confirmed in this reading by something akin to legislative history: a consideration of the source from which the legislative language appears to have been taken. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
A "writ of prohibition", in the United States, is an official legal document drafted and issued by a supreme court, superior court or an appeals court to a judge presiding over a suit in an inferior court. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 . [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
In New York, prior to 2012, the process of drawing district lines was entirely within the purview of the legislature,[FN1]subject to state and federal constitutional restraint and federal voting laws, as well as judicial review. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
In New York, prior to 2012, the process of drawing district lines was entirely within the purview of the legislature,[FN1]subject to state and federal constitutional restraint and federal voting laws, as well as judicial review. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:22 pm
(a)A civil action or criminal prosecution that is commenced in a State court and that is against or directed to any of the following may be removed by them to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1)The United States or any agency thereof or any officer (or any person acting under… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
Kammen cites the Massey case in the Supreme Court, which rested heavily on a state supreme court justice’s perceived bias. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
As relevant, and with my added italics and bracketed numbers, it provides: No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, [2] having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state… [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:53 am
In September 2014 the Supreme Court of India (in PUCL vs State of Maharashtra - see attachment) laid down clear guidelines about the action that needs to be taken in the aftermath of an incident of extra-judicial killing:a) para 31(2): "If pursuant to the tip-off or receipt of any intelligence, as above, encounter takes place and firearm is used by the police party and as a result of that, death occurs, an FIR to that effect shall be registered and… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
Below is a partially (very partially) annotated version of the opinion.First, the Court quoted Section 3 in its entirety, so here it is (hopefully for the last time in my lifetime):No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an… [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
Since 1887, federal law has contained what the Supreme Court has described as a “safe harbor” provision, which provides that the results of any state legal procedure for resolving disputes over the allocation of electors—judicial or otherwise—established in state law prior to Election Day shall be “conclusive” in determining how electors are to be allocated from that state. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
In that order, both textually and legally: “[1]This Constitution, and [2] the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and [3] all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in [4] the Constitution or [5] Laws of any State to the… [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
In the early days of the United States, the Supreme Court considered the territories to be part of the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am
As noted earlier, each State may appoint electors “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
My goal, though, is to show why those of all political views should be deeply troubled by the Supreme Court’s performance throughout American history. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
” Supreme Court Justice Robert Grier in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:36 am
Indeed, the clause empowers Congress to carry into execution not only its own powers, but also “all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
At the time of our second year, Alberto Gonzales has failed to interest any law firms in hiring him anywhere in the United States. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:32 am
At the time of our second year, Alberto Gonzales has failed to interest any law firms in hiring him anywhere in the United States. [read post]
