Search for: "United States v. 38 CASES, ETC."
Results 41 - 60
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2020, 2:17 am
Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir. 2003) [INCADAT reference: HC/E/USf 530] (United States); Kilah v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In many cases, when two workers file jointly, they are penalized for having a second earner in the household. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am
There are two judgments : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) and A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020). [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Introduction The Child Tax Credit (CTC) was created in 1997 as a financial support to families with children.[1] Since its inception, the CTC has evolved into a multidimensional dependent tax benefit interacting with similar credits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)[2] and the Child and Dependent Care Credit (CDCTC).[3] The CTC’s functional purpose is two-fold: first, reducing tax liability for parents with dependents, and second—in some cases—providing those… [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:37 pm
· On 17 March, China reported only one newly diagnosed COVID-19 case. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Targeted infrastructure funding is partly addressed by a Senate appropriations bill that devotes $690 million in fiscal year (FY) 2020 funding for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS) broadband loan and grant programs (presumably including the ReConnect program). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am
While prospects for significant federal spending on a new broadband program remain in limbo, Congress has allocated further funding to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) ReConnect funding for 2020 (item below). [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
Exigent Circumstances: What They Are and How They Allow Police to Search and Seize Without a Warrant
15 Mar 2019, 11:46 am
App. 1991), citing to United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit,… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.16 After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:29 am
Right of Publicity and Right of Privacy The Right of Privacy In 1928, United States Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis noted in his dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am
The statute reads as follows: (720 ILCS 5/11-18) (from Ch. 38, par. 11-18) Sec. 11-18. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 3:52 am
This means understanding how the United States Sentencing Manual works alongside corresponding case precedent (e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
The New Case, United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:09 am
See, United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
