Search for: "United States v. Bayer" Results 41 - 60 of 294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2018, 8:59 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Use in the United States has increased from 40 million pounds to almost 300 million pounds, according to the Sierra Club. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:14 am by Beth Graham
After the Federal Circuit issued its opinion, Dow filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
  Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:00 am by Karl Bayer
by Mark Kantor and Karl Bayer In National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:15 am by Cheryl Beise
Dow AgroSciences LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1854, 17 March 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:35 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to assert priority rights over a mark that… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Bayer Consumer Care AG 16-548 Issue: Whether Sections 14(3) and 43(a) of the Lanham Act allow a foreign business that has neither used nor registered its trademark in the United States to sue the owner of a U.S. trademark for conduct relating to the owner’s use of its U.S. mark. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
The International Trademark Association (INTA) has filed an Amicus Brief (here) in support of the petition for writ of certiorari seeking Supreme Court review of the Fourth Circuit's FLANAX decision, Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG, et al., 819 F.3d 697 (4th Cir. 2016) (4th Cir. 2016). [read post]