Search for: "United States v. CERTAIN INTERESTS IN PROPERTY, ETC." Results 41 - 60 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2010, 9:31 am by PaulKostro
BROOKDALE LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., d/b/a ALTERRA/STERLING HOUSE OF FLORENCE, ALTERRA, INC., d/b/a STERLING HOUSE OF FLORENCE, STERLING HOUSE OF FLORENCE, KAD RANDAL, VALEYNCIA PRICE, ANNIE LEWIS, and SHARON LUFLIN; IDA AZZARO, ETC V. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
First, the interpretation of the law that Apple is defending in this case is not really in the interest of a lot of companies. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:36 am by LindaMBeale
[Warning to readers--only peripherally about tax] In January of 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:05 am by David Klein
The proverbial battle of David versus Goliath is currently unfolding in United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:56 am by Jon
The Fourth Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:17 pm by Bona Law PC
United, Inc., the Supreme Court has “consistently stated” that “’the immediate buyers from the alleged antitrust violators’ may maintain a suit against the antitrust violators. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
The property had a commercial unit on the ground floor and three residential flats above – all leased. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Ryan Merkley
In the United States, the fair use doctrine allows the exploitation of a copyrighted work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
  One of the most interesting and important aspects of the new CIA guidelines concerns the acquisition, retention, use and dissemination of publicly available (or open-source) information concerning U.S. persons. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:17 pm by Bona Law PC
In the United States, Section 2 of the Sherman Act makes it illegal for anyone (person or entity) to “monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:01 am by Mikk Putk
However, a key benefit of the close collaboration is the involvement of researchers and experts from a whole variety of business units and technology groups. [read post]