Search for: "United States v. Christopher Long"
Results 41 - 60
of 470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
Fernandez Marques, Pfizer Gmbh (Germany) Christopher Hanes, GlaxoSmithKline (United States) Branding clinical trials: benefits in making the physician like the drug/recall it later. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:25 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals in United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:58 am
” It is also a crime, a relatively new crime: As Wikipedia also notes, between 1990 and 1993, “every state in the United States” made stalking a crime. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:42 pm
By: Christopher S. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 11:35 am
By: Christopher S. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
So long as they die lethal injections in the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:42 am
Facts: This case (Christopher Hicks v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Justice Viviano’s concurring and dissenting opinion explicitly calls for “adopting the approach to nondelegation advocated by Justice Gorsuch in Gundy v United States” (p 29 of his opinion). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:13 pm
UNITED STATES, 182 U.S. 516; 21 S. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
A notice of the lawsuit, Francis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:06 pm
AndreIn Salas v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 3:13 pm
If the Supreme Court did not so conclude in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:35 am
By Christopher S. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
In State v. [read post]
