Search for: "United States v. Correll" Results 41 - 60 of 659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2018, 7:41 am by Michael Risch
To verify our models, we interviewed notable patent attorneys practicing in the United States, Europe, and Asia. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:36 am by Dennis Crouch
And, these are the patents and applications that are most likely to be affected by the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:51 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The reimbursement rights of the VA are written into law and are set out in the 1990 case, United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:56 pm by Michelle C. Laubin
  Among other provisions, this bill would finally bring Connecticut in line with other states and with the 2005 United States Supreme Court decision in Schaffer v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:22 am by Jennifer Liu
She noted at the outset that plaintiffs did not even make the argument that irrevocable liability occurred in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by Serena Mayeri
The Loving decision came at a pivotal moment in the history of race, gender, law, and marriage in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:19 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:15 am by Robert Stoll
On February 6, 2019, in a split decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) found in Athena Diagnostics v. [read post]
” When Trafigura challenged the denial, the government argued that the levy was not a prohibited tax on exports but a “user fee,” citing United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am by Terry Hart
But many have noted that since Campbell, transformative use has caused fair use to grow overly expansive and unbalanced.4See, e.g., Jane Ginsburg, Fair Use in the United States: Transformed, Deformed, Reformed? [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 6:07 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (Quantum Fitness Corporation et al v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
Were I more ambitious, I might do an in-depth empirical study of overall dissent rates and closely-contested decisions as correlated with differential retirement rates in state supreme courts. [read post]