Search for: "United States v. Curtis"
Results 41 - 60
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34… [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:32 am
United States, 549 U.S. 457 (2007). [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 12:47 pm
Smith (Federal Court Jurisdiction) United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
In Lusby v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 1:38 pm
The United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case, but the Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed again. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:51 pm
Geatz v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Oklahoma; Post-Conviction Relief; Section 14 of the Curtis Act) United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 10:26 am
Stars & Stripes reports on United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court suggested an explanation for these and other missing powers in its famous 1936 decision, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm
Frey (Maine Indian Settlement Acts; Reservation Boundaries) United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:31 am
The United States Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday in a very interesting case. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:06 am
United States, 66 A.3d 1013 (D.C. 2013) and Frye v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:46 am
United States Postal Serv., 756 F.2d 1461, 1464 (9th Cir.1985) (stating test for Rule 41(b), the precursor to Rule 52(c)). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:05 am
With Jones v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:19 pm
Majorstake Limited (Respondents) v Curtis (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 10. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
In David Swartz, et al., v. [read post]
