Search for: "United States v. Expert Environmental Control, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
As the world’s first binding treaty to explicitly protect environmental defenders, the Escazu Agreement was a turning point – although, notably, the United States and many other countries are not signatories. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Smith Distributing Company, Inc. entered into an agreement with the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The appellate court rejected this argument as well, saying nothing in the program EIR requirements compelled later environmental review and stated that the requirement for later environmental review would be a function of the thoroughness of the initial program document. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm by Schachtman
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Summary and Analysis of the 2011 Gasoline Benzene Pre-Compliance Report (2012). [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Cardiologists implanted a covered stent manufactured by NuMed, Inc., a New York corporation that is one of the few developers of pediatric medical devices in the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]