Search for: "United States v. Freedman" Results 41 - 60 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Kaye and Freedman give an example from the epidemiologic literature: “Confounding remains a problem to reckon with, even for the best observational research. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
The United States had one amicus brief this term with a composite score of over 90. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:12 am
(OWH), holding that there were sufficient allegations of connections with the United States to constitute a “domestic transaction. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Victoria Clark
Dana Stuster updated us on the Hodeidah offensive in Yemen, the United States’ decision to withdraw from the U.N. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
When last we left Lawfare readers, the prosecution in the United States v. al-Nashiri military commission had begun “preadmission” of evidence despite the ongoing refusal of defense counsel to participate. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has turned down BuzzFeed’s request to move a libel case over its publication of a dossier containing unverified allegations against President Donald Trump to New York from Florida. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has turned down BuzzFeed’s request to move a libel case over its publication of a dossier containing unverified allegations against President Donald Trump to New York from Florida. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
After graduating from Harvard Law School, Dorsen spent five years as an assistant United States attorney in the Southern District of New York in the criminal division under Robert M. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Impson, 530 Fed.Appx. 777 (10th Cir. 2013) (ruling against Freedman descendant in Bivens action) United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:11 am by Elena Chachko
The 1946 Convention outlines the immunities and privileges of the UN as an organization, as well as those of three groups of individuals: representatives of member states, UN officials (i.e., permanent staff), and experts on missions for the UN. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
True, the Court does not hear full oral arguments between the end of June and the beginning of October (except in extraordinary circumstances, as when it held a reargument in Citizens United v. [read post]