Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
  Moreover in the process of racing toward remedy, there was a chance that the U.S. legal system, might be exposed to collateral damage--or more tactfully put, that its rules and systems of process might undergo dynamic change in the process of vindication claims (at least to the extent that such dynamic transformation is advanced by litigants and embraced by courts). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm by Sean Wajert
M/V Ya Mawlaya, 99 F.3d 717, 722 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. [read post]
  It is a question that has come before the United States Supreme Court on two prior occasions: When can a state require an out-of-state seller to collect and remit sales tax? [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:16 am by Amanda Rice
At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven Schwinn deems General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
SHAPIRO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
It is grounded in a set of basic premises: that law embedded within the domestic legal orders of states with legitimately established governments is the most authoritative form of regulation,[16] that authentic remedies must be embedded within domestic legal orders of legitimately constituted states,[17]and that law across jurisdictions can be harmonized in part because it reflects universal values, or can be made to be coherent, at least at some reasonable level of… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
The two cases below are consolidated and the cert. grant is limited to question 1 in 09-1298 and to question 2 in 09-1302: Title: General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]